Overview

Research design

Independent-samples

  • “Between-participants” design
  • Two treated samples containing different people
  • Individual differences contribute to variability

Advantages & disadvantages

  • Advantages of related-samples design
    • Requires fewer subjects (not true of matched subjects)
    • Able to study changes over time
    • Reduces or eliminates individual differences as a source of variability; therefore less variability in scores
  • Disadvantages of repeated-measures design
    • Factors besides treatment may cause subject’s score to change during the time between measurements
    • Participation in first treatment may influence score in the second treatment (order effects)
    • Counterbalancing is a way to control time-related or order effects
    • Participants can drop out

Equations

Logic

Sample A Sample B
54 43
67 57
38 39
46 41
42 36
Sample A Sample B D
54 43 -11
67 57 -10
38 39 1
46 41 -5
42 36 -6

Equations

\(t = \dfrac{\text{sample statistic} - \text{population parameter}}{\text{estimated standard error}}\)


Single sample:

\(t = \dfrac{M-\mu}{s_M}\)

Independent samples:

\(t = \dfrac{(M_1-M_2)-(\mu_1-\mu_2)}{s_{M_1-M_2}}\)

Related samples:

\(t = \dfrac{M_D-\mu_D}{s_{M_D}}\)

Hypothesis test

Triplett

  • E.g. Norman Triplett (1898)
    • Performing alone/in competition

Triplett, N. (1898). The dynamogenic factors in pacemaking and competition. The American Journal of Psychology, 9(4), 507-533. https://doi.org/10.2307/1412188

Triplett data

As independent samples

Alone \(X-M\) \((X-M)^2\)
54 4.6 21.16
67 17.6 309.76
38 -11.4 129.96
46 -3.4 11.56
42 -7.4 54.76
\(M = 49.40\) \(SS = 527.20\)
\(s^2 = 131.80\)
\(s = 11.48\)
Competition \(X-M\) \((X-M)^2\)
43 -0.2 0.04
57 13.8 190.44
39 -4.2 17.64
41 -2.2 4.84
36 -7.2 51.84
\(M = 43.20\) \(SS = 264.80\)
\(s^2 = 66.20\)
\(s = 8.14\)

As independent samples

  • Step 2: Decision criteria

\(\text{With } \alpha = .05, t_{critical} (8) = \pm 2.31\)

  • Step 3: Calculate

\(df = N - 2 = 10 - 2 = 8\)

\(s^2_p = \dfrac{SS_1 + SS_2}{df_1 + df_2} = \dfrac{527.2 + 264.8}{4 + 4} = 99\)

\(s_{M_1-M_2} = \sqrt{\dfrac{s_p^2}{n_1}+\dfrac{s_p^2}{n_2}} = \sqrt{\dfrac{99}{5}+\dfrac{99}{5}} = 6.29\)

\(t = \dfrac{(M_1-M_2)-(\mu_1-\mu_2)}{s_{M_1-M_2}} = \dfrac{49.4 - 43.2}{6.29} = 0.99\)

Effect size

  • Step 4b: Effect size
    • If the result was significant
    • Cohen’s \(d\) for related-samples \(t\)-test:

\[\begin{align} \text{Estimated Cohen's } d &= \dfrac{\text{mean of difference scores}}{\text{SD of difference scores}} \\ &= \dfrac{M_D}{s_D} \\ &= \dfrac{-6.2}{4.76} = -1.3 \end{align}\]

Report results

When performing in competition, children completed the race faster on average \((M = 43.2\); \(SD = 8.14)\) than when performing alone \((M = 49.4\); \(SD = 11.48)\). A related-samples found the difference to be statistically significant; \(t(4) =\) \(-2.91\), \(p <.05\), \(d = 1.30\).

Assumptions

  1. Observations within each treatment condition must be independent
  2. Population distribution of difference scores is normally distributed
    • With relatively large samples (n > 30) this assumption can be ignored

Confidence interval

  • Independent-samples

\[\begin{align} (\mu_1-\mu_2) &= (M_1-M_2) \pm t * s_{M_1-M_2} \\ &= (43.2 - 49.4) \pm 2.31 * 6.29 \\ &= -20.71, 8.31 \end{align}\]

  • Related-samples

\[\begin{align} \mu_D &= M_D \pm t * s_{M_D} \\ &= -6.2 \pm 2.78 * 2.13 \\ &= -12.12, -0.28 \end{align}\]

Learning checks

  1. Think of a research question which would require…
    • A single-sample \(t\)-test
    • An independent-samples \(t\)-test
    • A related-samples \(t\)-test
  2. What does it mean if the value of the \(t\) statistic is near \(0\) for:
    • A single-sample \(t\)-test?
    • An independent-samples \(t\)-test?
    • A related-samples \(t\)-test?